Reading and annotating

This is understanding that people who are called “sponsors” are considered that because they lend their time, knowledge, and resources to sponsor ones literacy.

This is connecting Gee and Brandt because she mentions how people view literacy narratives as a way to obtain social goods similar to Gee when he mentions discourses.

This is understanding because it says where a majority of sponsors are found. Such as teachers, parents, bosses.

This is connecting because identities can be connected to Gee as a form of a Discourse.

This is connecting because Haas also mentions the use of autonomous text and how it needs to be read to understand.

This is understanding because as stated above writing appears to change based on the social status and upbringing of the author.

This is understanding because both areas represent a type of identity that is common with narratives.

This is questioning and understanding because working with others seems to causes a shift in identity. However, I am questioning this because the identity never truly shifts it just appears as it truly is.

This is understanding because this is a common identity associated with narratives. It is known as a “hero identity”.