My ability to review my peers papers has changed for the better. Initially my reviews consisted of organization such as moving words to different places or local comments such punctuation, spelling, or grammar. Luckily after practice and careful revision of how I could improve my reviews I began presenting better ideas and evidence. I notice an increase in my curiosity for more details from my peers. I ask them to go more in depth about things that may not be prominent to the average reader. Although I have significantly improved my reviewing skills there are still things that need work. I feel that I still need to work on engaging with my peers papers in order to present more evidence and ideas to help them elaborate on certain topics. I also need overlook minor punctuation or grammar errors so that I can get to the real issues that need help. Hopefully with all these new tools and tricks my reviewing skill will continue to improve.
